Hyperliquid (HYPE)

hyperliquid is two years old. last quarter it did 92% of robinhood's entire trading volume. equities, options, crypto, all of it. $646b vs $704b https://t.co/Ju3YGJg14U

revenue is worthless if it doesn't accrue value to the token here's the fixed chart Hyperliquid https://t.co/pxNDXcVseL

Next hyperliquid:native leg up incoming ⏳ Don’t get shaken out here. It’s going to be a green week. HYPERLIQUID

CT lets anyone mint credibility out of thin air. Claim a win rate. Screenshot the one call that hit. Bury the rest. Nothing backs any of it. It is counterfeit, and the whole timeline keeps taking it as currency. So I opened the $HYPE market on @Fudmarkets to see what backed conviction actually looks like. 227 calls already settled. 13 still open. People holding a side for as little as one dollar. The board skewed one way, and one account, gaumisa, sat alone on the other side with three dollars behind it. Three dollars. It already says more than a year of free CT takes, because a dollar onchain is a position you cannot screenshot your way out of. That is FUD in my words. A take only counts once you post collateral behind it. Pick the token, pick the side, pick the timeframe, let the market settle it onchain. Others follow you or fade you. My read: this is the first time credibility on CT is backed instead of printed. A record that stays whether you are right or wrong. FUD Points Season 1 is live, tracking the

Markets are deep red on Hyperliquid Expect a bloody monday https://t.co/aEp1qo4Ktl

many people are calling for a hyperliquid type fee-on-volume. here is why it is not needed and why The Burn SIMD is sufficient imo. i believe average swap size per txn will probably go up a bit but not much over the course of the next few years if the onchain market thesis plays out. we may get huge blocks from institutions, but we will also get a lot more retail flow and the mean order size will be roughly the same order of magnitude. as such, taking 1 bp per swap now is going to be roughly the same as taking 1 bp per swap in a few years (on average). due to some optimizations, i believe compute resources per swap will go down a bit but not much over the course of the next few years. as such, resource fees per swap now is going to be roughly the same as in a few years. if you also believe these two statements, then you believe that resource fees per swap and bps per swap will be fairly correlated (and both go up with increased volume). given this correlation, it's best to just do resource fee for two rea