Avalanche (AVAX)

This seems like a genuine post so I’ll give a genuine answer

Yes, the adoption is absolutely real, ticketing and real world applications are being used via onchain transactions. This is a real use case and it’s more reliable, verifiable and cheaper (?) than regular cloud.

I don’t know if the word “partnership” is appropriate, I think the term customer is better. Furthermore, we don’t know if these institutions and corporations chose AVAX for its merits or if this “BD” partnership was bought, whether it be discounts or incentives.

Many headlines are blown out of proportion, remember that big Japan stablecoin news that was coming to AVAX? It wasn’t even a project, it was a working group to decide whether to launch a project. Emploids celebrated it as a win and AVAX wasn’t even chosen, there were 3 blockchains on the shortlist.

However, the market is pricing in the fact that none of this drives value to the AVAX token. A massive name like FIFA or Blackrock could create their own L1 and the only contribution to the AVAX ecosystem is 1.33avax per validator per month, $32 per month for a 4 validator L1 lol.

Furthermore, people been talking about how tokenomics fixes this, it’s just been talk talk talk with no results. There is a billion dollar foundation and they still can’t figure out how to improve tokenomics after 5 years? Oh, a billion dollar entity hired new ppl for months and there still isn’t any updates and is offering $50,000 for someone to fix its MOST CRITICAL issue. $50,000, so to me it’s not a priority and not being taken seriously.

As of this time now, the only use for owning AVAX is to have $1 for gas to interact with the ecosystem. There’s no need to hold more than $1 of $AVAX

2025 Avax eco 2026 Avax “eco” https://t.co/IosqcbUAmX

Spend all the summit money on making polymarket deploy to c chain. https://t.co/VKxkzjwEdJ