Starknet (STRK)

A lot of people don’t actually believe in the projects they defend. They believe in the allocation they might get from defending it. Big difference. That’s why someone can defend a project for months before TGE, then call it a rug the moment the reward does not match their expectation. You saw it with some people around Starknet. You saw it with zkSync. You’re seeing it again with MegaETH. Before reward: They say good tech, real infra, long-term play After reward: They say team rugged, waste of time, VC chain, never using this again And it works the other way too. A project people were doubting can suddenly become “one of the best teams in crypto” if the airdrop is good enough. Arbitrum rewarded well, people respected it. Jupiter rewarded users well, people defended it harder. That’s why crypto opinions are funny. Sometimes people are not judging the product. They are judging how much the product paid or can pay them.

Starknet fam The next bull market is HUGE https://t.co/7BNw7ghY69

Starknet is quietly laying the groundwork for two things crypto will need in the years ahead: privacy and quantum resistance. In the v0.14.3 proposal, two notable changes are currently up for vote: • Keccak support for client-side proving, paving the way for private transactions that leverage EVM signatures. • Replacing Pedersen with Blake in SNOS, an important step toward strengthening resilience against future quantum computing risks. Voting is now open to stakers and delegators and will remain open until June 26. Upgrades like these may not generate flashy headlines, but they are the kind of foundational infrastructure decisions that will determine which blockchains remain relevant over the next 5–10 years.

Privacy is gradually evolving from a technical concept into a user experience. This video shows that protecting your entire on-chain activity on Starknet now takes just a few clicks. Fast, simple, and affordable enough for everyday use. That’s how privacy becomes accessible to everyone.

We’ve become so used to accepting that every transaction has to be public. Balances. Payments. Employee salaries. Corporate treasury flows. STRK20 asks a different question: Why isn’t privacy the default? Onchain privacy is no longer a distant idea. It’s live on Starknet today.

Starknet AMM MySwap, vulnerability attack leads to $300,000 liquidity outflow https://t.co/lsIWlMkM9e https://t.co/kppOxZmWGU

Wu said he learned that the Starknet AMM protocol mySwap posted that its CL protocol suffered a vulnerability attack, resulting in about $300,000 being drained from the liquidity pool. The official stated that the interface has been closed to new liquidity for six months, and the damaged funds are mainly residual LP assets scattered across more than 100,000 positions. Currently, the remaining liquidity in the protocol has been almost completely emptied. The attacker has transferred the stolen funds across chains and concealed the flow of funds using the Railgun privacy network. https://t.co/SiuiF6MCpL

Starknet fam $STRK is 98% off. Are you still DCA-ing Or too scared to buy? Or you want to buy But you’re out of money? https://t.co/Www6bD2U95

zhaozhao seems to have been repeating "pay attention to strong-man projects" for the past two years, This is a new direction set for himself after holding STRK and watching it drop almost to zero. In each stage's main narrative, there are super-strong projects, plus the highly‑expected Dragon Two and Dragon Three. And almost every time it ends up as "Super‑strong all the way, but the highly‑expected ones collapse within seconds!" One must not focus too much on PR‑spam or social‑media press releases, but instead discern who is strong and who is weak. Back in the day, STRK was part of the STRK Wolf clan matrix press release. People who were optimistic were just getting a salary, so don't waste your hard‑earned money following them. "From L2s to new blockchains and their ecosystems, then to Perps, the stage tactics have never changed!" —————————————— Set a personal goal, review your holdings at least every 2–3 months. If in a certain track, your holdings are always the weakest, then even if you're bullish, you need to rotate about 10% of your position periodically! Regarding Aster, zhaozhao reduced his holding by 20,000 units, leaving only 64,000 units. · Swapped into Hype – this part rose 50%! · Swapped into BP – this part surged over 300%! · Swapped into CP – this part surged over 300%! · Swapped into O – this part rose 90%! —————————————— In some phases, zhaozhao hopes project teams won't allocate budgets to KOL&KOC for writing PR pieces and white‑washing articles; instead, keep that money for future pumping. Because in certain phases, who is organically tweeting? Who has vested interests? It's obvious at a glance. —————————————— For ASTER, I remain long‑term bullish. I believe that after ASTER cleans up the market and accumulates capital, it will definitely pump. However, I will continuously practice position rotation within phases. "Each price swing fork is a mirror that reveals the strong and the weak." —————————————— KOL&KOC matrix promotion vs genuine pumping? zhaozhao personally believes that, on the basis of genuine pumping, completing KOL&KOC matrix promotion is the most effective path. Finding a bunch of KOL&KOC matrix promotion, expecting their content to bring buying pressure, is very difficult. Only massive pumping can bring real buying pressure. While the price is falling, and a flood of KOL&KOC articles appears, it makes holders look too smart.