COOKIE (COOKIE)

#COOKIE $COOKIE The coin is in collapse and under Binance monitoring, and today's candle gave a good rebound But the coin's positivity somewhat breakthrough 0.0097 https://t.co/Fh22KOJ8iy

My 20k $COOKIE bag was worth $2000 when I first bought it Right now, I’m sitting on a $1,800 loss because the Cookie team didn't want to unlock our tokens (btw, the token is heading straight to zero as we speak) Honestly, it’s not a big deal for me Thanks to the reach of my account, I was able to get into several Cookie campaigns that ended up making me over $7,000 back then That said, I know a ton of people who staked $2k–$10k worth of COOKIE just to get that same boost and they got rekt completely Hopefully they will make it back

We are always open to reasonable, well-grounded debate, especially when it happens in a polite and constructive way. This is exactly what Web3 needs more of. @Trunnik was one of the few people who tried to show the situation from both sides, and we thank him for that. The market is not in its best stage right now, and we understand the frustration. But being reasonable, thinking critically, and looking at situations from multiple angles is what is required to succeed in any space, especially in a financial one. Since his post already covered the part about decision-making accountability and risk awareness, we won’t add anything further on that. People make financial decisions based on their own risk profile, analysis, and expectations. At least, that is how it is supposed to work. What we would like to add is our perspective, so the situation is clearer from our side. CookieDAO was indeed significantly affected by X’s decision. We did not control that decision. We could not control it. As for claims that we knew about it in advance, everyone is free to form their own view, but we do not believe speculation deserves further comment. We understand the perspective of people who were affected by this. At the same time, it is important to also look at the situation from the business side. The original logic was that KOLs staked COOKIE in exchange for mindshare boosts. Those boosts no longer exist because the campaign structure changed after X’s decision. However, users did receive those boosts for the campaigns that had already taken place, based on the amount they staked and the duration of their lock-up. Some participated for a longer period, some for a shorter one, but rewards were distributed in accordance with the staking structure that existed at the time. They also received rewards connected to those boosted campaigns. That is why our thinking was the following: releasing the stake early would have created an unfair outcome. Users would have received boosted rewards based on a longer lock-up, while no longer respecting the lock-up period that gave them access to that higher boost in the first place. Naturally, no one wanted to return already received rewards. At the same time, many expected the situation to be resolved only in their favor, while leaving the project itself in a vulnerable position. The duration of the stake directly influenced the reward boost. A longer lock-up meant a larger boost. The same boost could also have been achieved by staking more COOKIE for a shorter period if users were concerned about committing to a longer lock-up. There was never a guaranteed number of campaigns promised, nor a guaranteed duration for how long those campaigns would continue. From our perspective, users made a risk-based decision when choosing a longer staking period in exchange for a stronger boost. We fully understand why this became frustrating after the external situation changed. But the original structure was built around that risk-reward tradeoff, and that context matters when evaluating the situation fairly. This is not about dismissing anyone’s frustration. It is about explaining why the situation was not as one-sided as it may look from the outside. We are not running away from our past. We are not going silent. We are simply focusing on what we can control now, and that is continuing to build. Business decisions are tough. Sometimes you end up in a position where there are no perfect solutions, only difficult choices. And even then, you still have to make a decision if you want the project to survive. We don’t blame anyone. We don’t want to point fingers. We understand the frustration, and we also understand that not everyone will see the situation the same way. But our focus now is on building, improving, and moving the space forward. That is the only productive path from here. To everyone who criticizes us: sincerely, thank you. You really do make us stronger. And to everyone who is still with us: we love you. You are the best part of this journey. We’ll keep pushing forward.

OGAudit Web3 Research: @cookiedotfun $COOKIE - The MarketingFi Protocol Rebuilding After X Shut Its Core Product? Cookie DAO has been building the AI data layer for crypto marketing since 2024 executing a forced pivot after X banned its flagship social incentive product: - Cookie AI queries Cookie's proprietary database of 1.2 billion indexed posts to deliver finished, data backed analysis on KOL performance, narrative traction, competitor mindshare and campaign ROI and not internet search results but direct queries of real crypto social data that most projects cannot access. Cookie Pro is the Q1 2026 market intelligence product built on this infrastructure with Cookie MCP integration embedding Cookie's real time data directly into Claude AI interactions. - COOKIE is the first MarketingFi token built to capture and redistribute the $366B digital marketing value among users, creators and businesses, deployed as a LayerZero OFT omnichain token enabling cross chain transfers natively, with staking for platform access, governance rights and MarketingFi score boosts. Binance has added a watch tag to COOKIE and the token is listed on Coinbase. - X revoked API access for InfoFi apps financially rewarding posting directly forcing Cookie DAO to shut down Snaps, its core creator incentive product and causing a 13–20% price drop. Cookie Pro represents the strategic response, pivoting from social incentives to B2B data analytics but product market fit for the new direction has not yet been independently verified with user or revenue metrics. Is 1.2B indexed posts, Cookie Pro analytics, Claude MCP integration, LayerZero omnichain architecture and a $366B addressable marketing market the foundation for Cookie DAO's second act or does an externally forced flagship product shutdown, 97.9% ATH decline, 23.8% weekly loss and 20% of supply still locked confirm this is a project rebuilding from scratch at a fraction of its former valuation? Category: Artificial Intelligence / Governance Coin Name: $COOKIE Circulating Supply: 769.04M Market Cap: $9.98M Market Cap Rank: #1010 OG Score: 33.34 OG Score Rank: #416/1358 Reviewed by 6 OG Auditors. See the Social Audit with Reviews by crypto OG’s and more on the $COOKIE Coin page: ogaudit(.)com/crypto/cookie-cookie https://t.co/apARkPIAlP

$13.43M in 24H trading volume puts $COOKIE at the top of @BNBCHAIN AI agents sector, up from #3 last week.

#COOKIE $COOKIE Trying to break out of the consolidation range And I don’t rule out a beautiful upward wave 🌊, God willing Good luck to everyone, God willing 🤲 https://t.co/4nEtiMNVaX

$COOKIE ranks #3 by 24H trading volume among AI agents on @BNBCHAIN and sits in the top 11% by mindshare across the sector according to Cookie Pro.

30 days into @Chance_'s incubation, here’s the scoreboard. -\u003e 1,000+ creator boxes claimed via retroactive X scoring -\u003e 250 / 250 $COOKIE invite codes used -\u003e 1,000+ tweets matched to markets daily Instead of just tracking attention, we tied it directly to trading activity. Since then: -\u003e Daily active users up +147% -\u003e Total DAU more than doubled -\u003e +117% unique traders The usage spike says it clearly. Traders were missing context, not information.